Property talk:P10290

Documentation

• Start a query
• Current uses
• Statistics by class
• List of values
• List of qualifiers
• Count

hotel rating
star rating of the hotel

Represents	hotel rating (Q2976556)
Data type	Item
Domain	lodging (Q5056668) or hotel (Q27686)
Example	Hotel Des Indes (Q1959679) → 5-star hotel (HotelStars Union) (Q109248724) Burj al-Arab (Q62939) → 5-star hotel rating (Q109248725)
Tracking: usage	Category:Pages using Wikidata property P10290 (Q111140782)
See also	Booking.com hotel ID (P3607)
Lists	Items with the most statements of this property Count of items by number of statements (chart) Items with the most statements Items with the fewest statements Count of items by number of sitelinks (chart) Items with the most sitelinks Items with the most sitelinks, but no link to one Wikipedia (sample: Welsh Wikipedia, cywiki) Items with the fewest sitelinks Most linked wikis Items with the most identifier properties By value of property Most statements Fewest statements Most sitelinks Most linked wikis Total of sitelinks on items Most identifiers Fewest identifiers Items with no other statements Most recently created items Items with novalue claims Items with unknown value claims Usage history (total) Usage history (main statement) Chart by item creation date Database reports/Constraint violations/P10290 Map Random list
Proposal discussion	Proposal discussion
Current uses	Total 91,684 Main statement 91,680 >99.9% of uses Qualifier 2 <0.1% of uses Reference 2 <0.1% of uses
Search for values

[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]

Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10290#Entity types

Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10290#Scope, SPARQL

Type “lodging (Q5056668), hotel (Q27686)”: item must contain property “instance of (P31), subclass of (P279)” with classes “lodging (Q5056668), hotel (Q27686)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10290#Type Q5056668, Q27686, SPARQL

This property is being used by: hu:Sablon:Hotel infobox Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

We should mention to strongly encourage usage of qualifiers for the evaluator who gave the star rating

The usage of labels in the rating items to signify a hotel evaluator is STRONGLY discouraged. WE WANT THINGS NOT STRINGS in Wikidata. So, rather than individual star items that use strings in an item label to determine who the evaluator was (such as this that can cause less useful relationships 5-star hotel (HotelStars Union) (Q109248724)) Let's use qualifiers instead such as using 5-star hotel rating (Q109248725) and then applying a qualifier for who the evaluator was, in this case, HotelStars Union (Q10526603). I mentioned in talk on Talk:Q109248725 there is a lack of data quality concerning qualifiers and provenance. We need some way to say who was the evaluator who gave the star rating. Oftentimes it is hard to deduce this without some additional research by users, which in those cases, the qualifiers likely will just be missing and the generic 5-star hotel rating (Q109248725) can be applied and that's probably fine as long as a good reference is on the hotel rating (P10290) statement. So I think usage of qualifiers instead need to be encouraged and to give examples. In other words, model the system with generic classes for the 5-star system, then many evaluators that share that same system can be inserted with qualifiers as necessary. For instance, AAA is the evaluator who gave "5 diamonds" to the St. Regis New York on 55th street. We should have a generic rating item labeled "5 diamonds" that many evaluators can then reuse. Strong identifiers (not strings!) that offer reuse and can then be further qualified as necessary - IS OUR GOAL oftentimes in Wikidata. --Thadguidry (talk) 17:18, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

This property uses items and not strings. I don't think there's a lack of quality, star ratings are well established and really ambiguous. Germartin1 (talk) 02:23, 1 February 2022 (UTC)