Talk:Q1624079

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

What is going on?[edit]

@MB-one: what is going on? [1] GeoGQL (talk) 19:42, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nettelbeckplatz (Q1624079)located in the administrative territorial entity (P131)Wedding (Q675187) is an invalid statement, since the value of a located in the administrative territorial entity (P131) statment should always be of a subclass of administrative territorial entity of Berlin (Q116752706). However, Nettelbeckplatz (Q1624079)location (P276)Wedding (Q675187) is a valid statment. Does that answer your question? MB-one (talk) 07:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But Wedding is an administrative territorial entity. It isn't some physical substance, the borders do not exist of a change in matter (e.g. a lake has as border where a change from liquid matter [often water] to solid matter occurs), but the borders are purely created by human thoughts: to administrate data, e.g. in databases - managed by database administrators. So, it is an administrative entity. And it is a territorial entity, since it has some territory assigned to it and only to it. That is different from e.g. the Ministry of Defence of India and the Ministry of Healthcare of India - they also of territory assigned to it, but that is the territory of India. What about "administrative territorial entity" do you contest? GeoGQL (talk) 16:00, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]