Property talk:P3093

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

recovered by
person, organisation or vehicle that recovered the item. Use the most specific value known.
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3093#Scope, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Property “instance of (P31)” declared by target items of “recovered by (P3093): If [item A] has this property with value [item B], [item B] is required to have property “instance of (P31)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). Known exceptions: Ötzi (Q171291)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3093#Target required claim P31, SPARQL, SPARQL (by value)
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3093#Entity types

Problematic coordination use with paintings

[edit]

I had reviewed this for creation and came to the conclusion that it wasn't ready, as the sample given wasn't compatible with the current structure at Wikidata:WikiProject_Visual_arts/Item_structure#Object_history_or_provenance. You may want to sort this out before using it. Not sure why it was created in the meantime. Anyways ..
--- Jura 11:58, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When asked on the property proposal you did not answer why you thought there was a problem. --Izno (talk) 12:17, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There are enough use cases unrelated to visual arts that this property can be applied to. The remaining niggles can be sorted out on this page. Feel free to start a constructive discussion about them. --Srittau (talk) 13:18, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Currently, from a property creator point of view, there is nothing more to do. Let them sort it out.
--- Jura 13:23, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]