Talk:Q1022488
Autodescription — Brighton and Hove (Q1022488)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Brighton and Hove” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Generic queries for administrative territorial entities
This list of queries is designed for all instances of administrative territorial entity (Q56061). It is generated using {{TP administrative area}}.
Geography
- Places in Brighton and Hove (query)
- Map of places in Brighton and Hove (query)
- List of monuments (Monumental (Q29167605))
- List of places ordered by altitude (query) (Based on elevation above sea level (P2044).)
- Count of buildings by architectural style (query)
- List of highest buildings (query) (Based on height (P2048).)
- Organizations with headquarters in Brighton and Hove (query)
- List of items which have power over or which apply to Brighton and Hove (query) (applies to jurisdiction (P1001))
People
- People born in Brighton and Hove, sorted by number of sitelinks (query)
- Main occupation of people born in Brighton and Hove (query)
- People dead in Brighton and Hove, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (place of death (P20))
- People buried in Brighton and Hove, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (place of burial (P119))
- People living in Brighton and Hove, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (residence (P551))
Arts and fictions
- List of items with narrative location in Brighton and Hove (query) (narrative location (P840))
- List of movies with filming location in Brighton and Hove (query) (filming location (P915))
- See also: Wikidata:WikiProject Country subdivision
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
The current treatment of Brighton and Hove is anomalous in the context of Wikidata items for similar places in England. We have a single item that treats Brighton and Hove both as a city and as a unitary authority. However, I see it in exactly the same category as, say, Southampton, which has separate Wikidata items for Southampton the city (Q79848) and City of Southampton (Q21683230) which is the unitary authority. The same goes for Portsmouth the city (Q72259) and City of Portsmouth (Q21683233) the unitary authority. The cases of Brighton and Hove, Southampton and Portsmouth are very similar, in that in all cases the boundaries of city and unitary authorities are essentially the same. (In this respect they are different from, say, Canterbury and City of Canterbury, where the unitary authority is geographically much larger.)
My particular interest here is that I've been creating a series of articles on local authority districts in England for Cywiki. There are separate articles for all the geographical places (cities, towns) where they have the same name as these districts. All these articles (districts and places) have Infoboxes calling Wikidata. Everything has worked happily up till now, since separate Wikidata items have been created for places and local authorities. But Brighton and Hove breaks the pattern.
(By the way, Enwiki does things differently. It often treats geographical places and local authorities in the same article. But I don't want to do that for Cywiki, because I want to take full advantage of the separate Wikidata items where they do exist.)
I'd like to see all the unitary authority material moved from here to a new "City of Brighton and Hove" Wikidata item. That would create logical and consistent result. But this isn't something I can just implement without support from the community. What do others think? --Craigysgafn (talk) 21:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)