Talk:Q132931
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — Buynaksk (Q132931)
description: town in the Republic of Dagestan, Russia
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Buynaksk” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Generic queries for administrative territorial entities
This list of queries is designed for all instances of administrative territorial entity (Q56061). It is generated using {{TP administrative area}}.
Geography
- Places in Buynaksk (query)
- Map of places in Buynaksk (query)
- List of monuments (Monumental (Q29167605))
- List of places ordered by altitude (query) (Based on elevation above sea level (P2044).)
- Count of buildings by architectural style (query)
- List of highest buildings (query) (Based on height (P2048).)
- Organizations with headquarters in Buynaksk (query)
- List of items which have power over or which apply to Buynaksk (query) (applies to jurisdiction (P1001))
People
- People born in Buynaksk, sorted by number of sitelinks (query)
- Main occupation of people born in Buynaksk (query)
- People dead in Buynaksk, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (place of death (P20))
- People buried in Buynaksk, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (place of burial (P119))
- People living in Buynaksk, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (residence (P551))
Arts and fictions
- List of items with narrative location in Buynaksk (query) (narrative location (P840))
- List of movies with filming location in Buynaksk (query) (filming location (P915))
- See also: Wikidata:WikiProject Country subdivision
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Odd inter-wiki linking behaviour[edit]
I have noticed in the edit history of this item that there are issues with inter-linking between Wikidata and Wikivoyage. The pattern can also be seen in other items for cities that have Wikivoyage articles, such as Q1025918 and Q147756. I suspect that the problem is on the Wikivoyage side, possibly as a result of page deletion vandalism. The links from Wikipedia suggest that the articles keep getting vandalised which leads to inconsistencies. — ArticCynda (talk) 12:27, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- I'm sorry but what? These deletions are not vandalism, but Ikan and I deleted those, because it was you who was evading your block and then when we deleted those pages as part of enforcing the block, you accuse us for "vandalism". And the saddest part of this thing is, you still don't think you're at fault here. SHB2000 (talk) 11:55, 7 November 2021 (UTC):
- The deletions do have all the usual characteristics of vandalism, though:
- No prior discussion on the article's talk page
- Not tagged with {{vfd}} or {{delete}}
- Engaging in an edit war with at least 4 different editors restoring the deleted content
- Wikivoyage is a travel guide, so the act of deleting entire articles of useful travel information from it is indeed an act of vandalism, in my opinion. At worst, the articles should be redirected to region articles instead of being deleted to preserve links from Wikidata and Wikipedia. Currently, the Wikipedia articles for these cities still advertise Wikivoyage articles that you deleted, and inconsistencies like that should be avoided.
- If the proper procedure had been followed, and the articles that bother you had been nominated for deletion with {{vfd}}, then argue the case on the votes for deletion talk page, there would have been no confusion.
- — ArticCynda (talk) 09:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- The deletions do have all the usual characteristics of vandalism, though: