Talk:Q20136634
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — Wikipedia overview article (Q20136634)
description: article in Wikipedia which gives an overview of a topic or time period
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Wikipedia overview article” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Wikipedia overview article (Q20136634)
- Wikipedia article page (Q50081413)
- review article (Q7318358)
- scholarly article (Q13442814)
- scientific publication (Q591041)
- scholarly work (Q55915575)
- →(∇) article (Q191067)
- →(#%) scientific literature (Q12042160)
- secondary source (Q905511)
- scholarly article (Q13442814)
- Wikipedia overview article (Q20136634)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
Wikipedia overview article⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Use of item with P31[edit]
See Wikidata:Project_chat#Wikipedia_overview_article_(Q20136634). --- Jura 10:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Moebeus: --- Jura 10:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hi @Jura1:! Not sure I understand what you're asking. Are you asking if we need this item at all, or if we need it in relation to religion of an area ? I tend to look at "Wikipedia overview article" as a kind of "fallback item" when for whatever reason it's hard to be more specific. Being more specific would always be preferable in my opinion, but maybe not always (immediately) possible? Moebeus (talk) 12:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, some (not all) of the uses seems to be from you, e.g. at Q2073487. The use of "main subject" makes them fundamentally different from (usual) subclasses. As mentioned on project chat, this can be useful for e.g. "outline of" pages at Wikipedia, as Wikipedia has both this and articles about the topic being outlined.
- Hi @Jura1:! Not sure I understand what you're asking. Are you asking if we need this item at all, or if we need it in relation to religion of an area ? I tend to look at "Wikipedia overview article" as a kind of "fallback item" when for whatever reason it's hard to be more specific. Being more specific would always be preferable in my opinion, but maybe not always (immediately) possible? Moebeus (talk) 12:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Here, I didn't come across any, so I would just replace Q20136634 with usual subclasses and (if it has no other use) delete it. --- Jura 12:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Moebeus: I looked at religion items, but it applies to all its uses as Wikipedia doesn't seem to have two types of articles for most uses. If you don't mind, I would make this type of change for religion. --- Jura 20:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jura1: Ah, I see, I was the culprit all along :) Well I don't mind your change, looks like an improvement to me 👍 Moebeus (talk) 16:46, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Here, I didn't come across any, so I would just replace Q20136634 with usual subclasses and (if it has no other use) delete it. --- Jura 12:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)