Talk:Q749
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — Groningen (Q749)
description: capital city of the province of Groningen, the Netherlands
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Groningen” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Generic queries for administrative territorial entities
This list of queries is designed for all instances of administrative territorial entity (Q56061). It is generated using {{TP administrative area}}.
Geography
- Places in Groningen (query)
- Map of places in Groningen (query)
- List of monuments (Monumental (Q29167605))
- List of places ordered by altitude (query) (Based on elevation above sea level (P2044).)
- Count of buildings by architectural style (query)
- List of highest buildings (query) (Based on height (P2048).)
- Organizations with headquarters in Groningen (query)
- List of items which have power over or which apply to Groningen (query) (applies to jurisdiction (P1001))
People
- People born in Groningen, sorted by number of sitelinks (query)
- Main occupation of people born in Groningen (query)
- People dead in Groningen, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (place of death (P20))
- People buried in Groningen, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (place of burial (P119))
- People living in Groningen, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (residence (P551))
Arts and fictions
- List of items with narrative location in Groningen (query) (narrative location (P840))
- List of movies with filming location in Groningen (query) (filming location (P915))
- See also: Wikidata:WikiProject Country subdivision
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Groningen in Groningen and Groningen[edit]
If I look at Q749 it says "Groningen is located in 1) Groningen, 2) Groningen". Tamawashi (talk) 10:33, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- Please stop the forum shopping Tamawashi, see Talk:Q134390.
- As described there and also on Talk:Q889 by Joshbaumgartner, we disambiguate in the description, not in the label. Multichill (talk) 10:40, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- Please stop making false claims. Tamawashi (talk) 10:50, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Comment Actually Tamawashi, Multichill is correct: it says very clearly in the Help:Label guidelines that disambiguation information does not belong in the label. That is what the description is for. On a side note, accusing someone of making false claims is really not constructive, please avoid provocative language such as that in the interest of civil discussion. Thanks! Joshbaumgartner (talk) 07:02, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- @Joshbaumgartner, Multichill: It does not. See that Help:Label#Disambiguation information belongs into the description (says [word inserted later]): "When a page title includes disambiguation in it, either through commas or parentheses, the disambiguation should be left out." - bolding mine. Regarding "accusing someone of making false claims is really not constructive" - well, I thought, false claims are not constructive in the first place and not "in the interest of civil discussion"? Tamawashi (talk) 12:31, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- I'm wondering, Tamawashi do you understand the difference between "label" and "description"? Because if you do, your comment makes no sense to me.
- In this case we have three page titles, three labels and three descriptions:
- nl:Groningen (stad), Groningen (Q749), "capital city of the province of Groningen, the Netherlands"
- nl:Groningen (gemeente), Groningen (Q892526), "municipality in the Netherlands"
- nl:Groningen (provincie), Groningen (Q752), "province of the Netherlands"
- Exactly how it's described at the help page. Multichill (talk) 12:47, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- So, if I do not understand the difference, then my previous comment would make sense to you? Also "the help page" does not mention Groningen at all, so with "Exactly how it's described at the help page" you once again made a false claim. If you did not understand a part or all of my previous comment, feel free to specify. Tamawashi (talk) 13:41, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- @Joshbaumgartner, Multichill: It does not. See that Help:Label#Disambiguation information belongs into the description (says [word inserted later]): "When a page title includes disambiguation in it, either through commas or parentheses, the disambiguation should be left out." - bolding mine. Regarding "accusing someone of making false claims is really not constructive" - well, I thought, false claims are not constructive in the first place and not "in the interest of civil discussion"? Tamawashi (talk) 12:31, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- Please stop making false claims. Tamawashi (talk) 10:50, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
