Talk:Q811534
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — remarkable tree (Q811534)
description: tree which, because of its great age, size or condition, or historical connection, is of exceptional cultural, landscape or nature conservation value
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “remarkable tree” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
remarkable tree⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Discussion[edit]
Please see Topic:V87m4to604yhvklx (French language). --- Jura 05:35, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
cswiki[edit]
{{Editprotected}}
Please, change link to Památný strom. 217.117.125.83 16:55, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Succu, this doesn't make sense: Special:Diff/1561771473/1561772514. Remarkable tree after all is a kind of tree (its subclass). Statement P279=natural monument (Q23790) on the other hand implies that all remarakble trees are considered natural monuments, which is not true. 2001:7D0:81DA:F780:FC17:A81D:BA5D:7BCB 08:43, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- I do tend to use this item only for law-protected trees while I use remarkable tree (Q10065268) for others. Same differentiation is observed on Czech Wikipedia. I suggest we keep Succu's edit here, but also add subclass of (P279) : remarkable tree (Q10065268) to it. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 08:54, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- That's another issue. This distinction isn't evident based on this item and based on some sitelinks, such as English one. Note that not all natural monuments are necessarily protected either, at least not in all countries. If cs:významný strom is more generic, then maybe swap cswiki sitelinks (i.e. move given sitelink here)? 2001:7D0:81DA:F780:FC17:A81D:BA5D:7BCB 09:07, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Create „individual tree“ (instance of tree) and have fun fixing all issues. --Succu (talk) 20:39, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- What issues? As for "individual tree" item, I don't see a point, as is the case also for "individual organism" (Talk:Q110224119). 2001:7D0:81DA:F780:4CC9:C179:CF0A:1E0F 09:46, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- Create „individual tree“ (instance of tree) and have fun fixing all issues. --Succu (talk) 20:39, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Proposed required propery individual of taxon (P10241)[edit]
I propose adding constraint that individual of taxon (P10241) is required if item is instance of remarkable tree (Q811534). @Succu @Vojtěch Dostál. Papuass (talk) 13:15, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Papuass makes sense to me. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 15:47, 15 August 2023 (UTC)