There has been a strange mix beetween this two.
I believe the itwiki links it:Tomba a corridoio should me move from gallery grave (Q1428504) to passage grave (Q1426772) and it:Allée couverte from gallery grave (Q18697391) to gallery grave (Q1428504) and finaly gallery grave (Q18697391) turn into a redirect to gallery grave (Q1428504). Is my understanding correct?
- @Xoil, Sjoerddebruin, Shonagon, Zolo, Gbeckmann: you edited this items, do you agree?
- Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:53, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks to have found a relevant solution! I agree with your proposal. Shonagon (talk) 11:22, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- @VIGNERON: As that seemed correct and non-controversial, I did what you suggested.
- That said, if we are to follow Wikipedia articles, it actually seems that gallery grave (Q1428504) should be split into 3:
- fr:Allée couverte = it:Allée couverte = nl:Allée couverte. A type of tomb, found in France and Belgium
- de:Galeriegrab = a type of tomb found in Germany, and similar to Allée couverte
- en:Gallery grave a generalization of 1 and 2 (ie 1 and 2 are subclasses of it)
- I am not clear with eo:Galeritombo. The article appears to be more or less a translation of fr:Allée couverte, but the word appears to be a calque of "tombe à couloir" (well could be a calque of "Galeriegrab too o_0*)--Zolo (talk) 12:55, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you Zolo. The organisation of all these megaliths is quite complicate. I tried to understand it when I wrote La Roche-aux-Fées (Q1799090) but it was too fuzzy. I'm not even sure if « allée couverte » is a subclass of « dolmen » or if it's a style/shape/design/whatever of dolmen. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 13:36, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
|