Wikidata:Property proposal/ANPI person ID
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ANPI person ID[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Person
Not done
| Description | identifier of a person of National Association of Italian Partisans (Q3626661)'s Web portal |
|---|---|
| Data type | External identifier |
| Domain | human (Q5) |
| Allowed values | [a-z][-a-z]* |
| Example 1 | Primo Levi (Q153670) → primo-levi |
| Example 2 | Sandro Pertini (Q1233) → alessandro-pertini |
| Example 3 | Rosselli brothers (Q3752399) → carlo-e-nello-rosselli |
| Source | https://www.anpi.it/donne-e-uomini |
| External links | Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt]. |
| Formatter URL | https://www.anpi.it/donne-e-uomini/$1 |
| See also | Wikidata:Property proposal/ANPI person numeric ID |
- Motivation
National Association of Italian Partisans (Q3626661) is the main association founded by participants of the Italian resistance against the Italian Fascist regime and the subsequent Nazi occupation during World War II. I think this would be a relevant identifier for a person.
Proposed aliases:
- Donne e Uomini della Resistenza ID
- Partigiani d'Italia ID
- ANPI ID
Notified participants of WikiProject Italy --Horcrux (talk) 15:19, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
Support --Camelia (talk) 15:36, 22 February 2021 (UTC)- Support--Pierpao (talk) 15:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support --FeltriaUrbsPicta (talk) 16:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support--Patafisik (talk) 17:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Comment what's the relation to Wikidata:Property proposal/ANPI person numeric ID? We would we need both? --- Jura 18:16, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jura1: There is a 1:1 correspondence between them. I thought the de facto standard in cases like this was to create both properties (e.g. Property:P6361 vs. Property:P6218, Property:P8152 vs. Property:P8151, Property:P3910 vs. Property:P7923, etc.). --Horcrux (talk) 18:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Not that I'm aware of. Property:P3910 was replaced by Property:P7923. Sometimes we create one and notice later that it's not sufficiently stable for our purposes and we should have created it differently in the first place (e.g. Twitter numeric vs. Twitter name). I listed Property:P8152 for deletion as it duplicates Property:P8151 and wasn't even properly proposed. --- Jura 19:55, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jura1: There is a 1:1 correspondence between them. I thought the de facto standard in cases like this was to create both properties (e.g. Property:P6361 vs. Property:P6218, Property:P8152 vs. Property:P8151, Property:P3910 vs. Property:P7923, etc.). --Horcrux (talk) 18:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Strong support --Luca.favorido (talk) 19:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Oppose per above. --- Jura 22:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)- Support----.laramar. (talk) 12:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. One identifier is enough for the moment, and the numerical one we already have seems more legit than this one. Thierry Caro (talk) 00:47, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support, Notified participants of WikiProject Italy — MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 09:38, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
- Strong support - --Susanna Giaccai (talk) 10:10, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
- Strong support Perché non ci ho pensato io! Galessandroni (talk) 14:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support --divudì 20:15, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
- Support, Notified participants of WikiProject Biographical Identifiers — MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 10:23, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I still don't see why this should be created. A qualifier on the ANPI person numeric ID (P9267) can do the same. --- Jura 20:27, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose already exists Wikidata:Property proposal/ANPI person numeric ID --DnaX (talk) 19:00, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose see above Nepalicoi (talk) 15:35, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Not done Unclear if needed, lack of consensus --Emu (talk) 21:51, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
