Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pratap Pandit
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- დამოკიდებულება (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate)
Suspected related users
[edit]- Pratap Pandit (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate)
- Nwalker3 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate)
- Jedi3 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate)
- Luke Jedi Skywalker (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate)
- ΞΔΞ (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate)
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: According to a comment made by a anonymous IP adress at User talk:Pratap Pandit this user is guilty of sockpuppeting
I know nothing about the user so I'll let the CU's decide if we should follow up on this accusation Trade (talk) 17:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Trade: Special:Contributions/Nwalker3 isn't registered here --DannyS712 (talk) 22:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: Accounts are mostly active on enwikiquote as their homewikis and edits here are relating to adding links to enwikiquote --DannyS712 (talk) 22:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: Special:CentralAuth/Pratap_Pandit is blocked on enwiki as part of w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cedix --DannyS712 (talk) 22:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
@Sotiale:, @Jasper Deng:--Trade (talk) 13:36, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Results:
Declined Insufficient evidence has been provided; in any case, this should be handled as a Wikiquote case as the suspected socking is primarily there.--Jasper Deng (talk) 07:35, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Wouldn't the Wikiquote case be a part of the evidence? --Trade (talk) 12:23, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Trade: In this case, the evidence is not very clear-cut and the burden to provide the evidence is on the one bringing forward the case. Either way, Wikiquote should be taking the lead on this, not us.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:28, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Could you look at the second CU request?--Trade (talk) 20:48, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Trade: In this case, the evidence is not very clear-cut and the burden to provide the evidence is on the one bringing forward the case. Either way, Wikiquote should be taking the lead on this, not us.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:28, 18 May 2020 (UTC)