Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2020/01/19
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
Hordeum (Q27992572): genus of plants: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
(Q518044) Marek Mazurkiewicz (talk) 23:38, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
- I merged the pages. Robin van der Vliet (talk) (contribs) 00:09, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Done Redirect created by User:Robin van der Vliet, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Norwegian Bandy Premier League 2018–19 (Q65233860): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Should have been linked to Norwegian page "NM i bandy 2019" not 2018. 109.247.162.150 21:37, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Not done i made the corrections and merged the already existing items. Quakewoody (talk) 01:16, 19 January 2020 (UTC)- @Quakewoody: Please check your sign. Thanks. 轻语者 (talk) 00:57, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Sirius (Q12069315): binary star system in the constellation of Canis Major: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
This is a doublet for Q3409. There seem to by some other problem, so I can't merge them. Deryni (talk) 10:30, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- The problem is - there are two articles on uk.WP. We can't do anything about here until they do something about it there. Quakewoody (talk) 12:29, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:MatSuBot, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:40, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q82830141: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable --P134toP4913 (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q82830287: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable --P134toP4913 (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q82916005: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable --P134toP4913 (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q82926192: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable --P134toP4913 (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q82950120: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Nonsense --P134toP4913 (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q82958526: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable --P134toP4913 (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q82981437: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable --P134toP4913 (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q82987345: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable --P134toP4913 (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q83001598: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable --P134toP4913 (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q83001601: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable --P134toP4913 (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Elsa Ségalowitch (Q82980755): French pharmacist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Lack of notability and no sitelink Eihel (talk) 15:40, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Keep, as she passes second (she is described by two authorities) and third (his item is needed there) points of WD:N. 92.184.98.109 16:35, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
- Knowing the rules on Wikidata is a good idea, but it's not about interpreting it. Point 2 speaks of references and not of authority (like a URL link for example like on Wikipedia). By searching for Elsa Ségalowitch, only a LinkedIn link exists. People who have obtained a thesis are not necessarily notorious.
Also Cytométrie de flux : principales applications (Q82992172) does not seem essential to Wikidata and, if this is the case, Q82980755 and Q82992172 can be{{vd}}. - Otherwise all pharmacists in the world could have an Item and Wikidata is not a person directory or a commercial register. Thank you for your understanding. —Eihel (talk) 18:50, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
- Je réponds en français. En effet, connaître les règles est une bonne chose. Pour le reste, il semblerait que vous ignoriez que tous les auteurs qui ont publié ou rédigés des travaux déposés sont admissibles, et qu'on crée en masse des éléments sur des chercheurs et des articles scientifiques (voir par exemple le travail de LargeDatasetBot). Donc si, avoir soutenu une thèse (y compris de pharmacie) rend notable au sens de Wikidata ; vous pouvez toujours proposer l'élément sur cette thèse à la suppression, mais je doute que cela aboutisse. Par ailleurs : peu importe ce qu'on trouve sur Google (cette personne a bien le droit de posséder un compte Linkedin), seuls comptent les éléments d'admissibilité apportés ; quant à la remarque sur le registre de commerce, je ne l'ai pas comprise puisque l'élément incriminé ici ne contient aucun renseignement de cet ordre. Merci aussi pour votre compréhension, 92.184.98.109 20:14, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
- But, at the same time, there has to be something to be found if those other identifiers exist. For example, what is "Cytométrie de flux : principales applications" that VIAF states? Quakewoody (talk) 18:55, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Quakewoody: Or it is the pharmacist herself or one of her acquaintances who entered this data on Wikidata through her phone (IP - Orange in France). For me, he is a person who runs a pharmacy and she got a pharmacist’s doctorate to do it. It's not like she discovered a drug to cure vandalism
. And no, there is nothing else apart from this thesis (question you are asking and which is cited above) which is not overwhelming in the authorities. —Eihel (talk) 19:28, 18 January 2020 (UTC) - @Quakewoody: as stated there, it's Ségalowitch's thesis. (And unlike what is supposed supra, I have nothing to do with this author). Cheers, 92.184.98.109 20:14, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Ok with point 3 of WD:N —Eihel (talk) 21:06, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for changing your mind. Cheers, 92.184.98.109 06:29, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Quakewoody: Or it is the pharmacist herself or one of her acquaintances who entered this data on Wikidata through her phone (IP - Orange in France). For me, he is a person who runs a pharmacy and she got a pharmacist’s doctorate to do it. It's not like she discovered a drug to cure vandalism
- Knowing the rules on Wikidata is a good idea, but it's not about interpreting it. Point 2 speaks of references and not of authority (like a URL link for example like on Wikipedia). By searching for Elsa Ségalowitch, only a LinkedIn link exists. People who have obtained a thesis are not necessarily notorious.
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:44, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
92.184.98.109 06:29, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
intensive animal farming (Q83133894): type of intensive agriculture, specifically an approach to animal husbandry designed to maximize production, while minimizing costs: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Q912362と重複 --慈姑鑑真 (talk) 08:09, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:P134toP4913, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:20, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Virgil De Commer (Q2383816): Belgian politician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Same person as Q15883469, which is connected to the correct article on nl.wikipedia --GeeJee (talk) 10:43, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
- Done I merge them. 轻语者 (talk) 11:38, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q83110708: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable P134toP4913 (talk) 07:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Delete Out of project scope. 轻语者 (talk) 11:43, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q83084499: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Nonsense P134toP4913 (talk) 07:11, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q65559591: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No relevance recognizable. HarryNº2 (talk) 07:11, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Seems not have enough notability. 轻语者 (talk) 11:42, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q60172611: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
(1) Does not meet notability criteria (delete from wiki FR for this reason [1]) ; (2) No source ; (3) Not meet structural need => does not meet any criteria for conservation. See Wikidata:Notability. --EulerObama (talk) 12:03, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q76455677: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability?Is this person notable? EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:49, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
- No, he's not. Nor would I put much faith in his record label or any of the artists. Basically, everything that is linked should be deleted. Quakewoody (talk) 02:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q81290887: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No relevance recognizable. HarryNº2 (talk) 06:22, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q81291010: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No relevance recognizable. HarryNº2 (talk) 06:35, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q81291767: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No relevance recognizable. HarryNº2 (talk) 06:36, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q81295355: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No relevance recognizable. HarryNº2 (talk) 06:37, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q82752799: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No relevance recognizable. HarryNº2 (talk) 06:38, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q82754092: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No relevance recognizable. HarryNº2 (talk) 06:39, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q65562704: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No relevance recognizable. HarryNº2 (talk) 06:40, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q83079717: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable P134toP4913 (talk) 07:09, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q83103631: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable P134toP4913 (talk) 07:09, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q83116598: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable P134toP4913 (talk) 07:09, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
- previously deleted Quakewoody (talk) 12:29, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q65559759: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No relevance recognizable. HarryNº2 (talk) 07:09, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
invalid ID (L234647): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not a lexeme/nonsense P134toP4913 (talk) 07:13, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q82899325: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable --P134toP4913 (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q82931457: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable --P134toP4913 (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q82931458: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable --P134toP4913 (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q82934199: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable --P134toP4913 (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q82968396: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable --P134toP4913 (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q82978313: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty --P134toP4913 (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q83036559: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable --P134toP4913 (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q83062915: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable --P134toP4913 (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Forslund (Q1438197): Wikimedia disambiguation page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Contained the de-Wikipedia page while en and sv are already covered by Q21510972 where I transferred de --Cymothoa exigua (talk) 16:05, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:10, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- Not deleted. Bencemac (talk) 14:59, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q81742537: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable (with family) Nadzik (talk) 12:57, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:10, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted by Bencemac (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:00, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q81742660: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable (with family) Nadzik (talk) 12:58, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:10, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted by Bencemac (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:00, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q81742650: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable (with family) Nadzik (talk) 12:58, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:10, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted by Bencemac (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:00, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q81743015: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
One role in a movie 12 years ago [2]. Not notable Nadzik (talk) 12:59, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
- also delete Q81744299 Quakewoody (talk) 13:26, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Q81743640: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable (with family) Nadzik (talk) 12:59, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:10, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted by Bencemac (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:00, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q81767908: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable (with family) Nadzik (talk) 13:00, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:10, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted by Bencemac (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:00, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q81677496: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable Nadzik (talk) 13:03, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
third miscarried child of Anne of Great Britain (Q75381653): (1697-1697): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Lacks notability --- Jura 04:53, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:01, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- A son of a queen; the royal children of course have notability. Was this stillborn child nameless? or was he named in some way? I think the item can be kept because of structural need, and the English label might be changed to "Third of stillborn sons of Anne of Great Britain".
See also Q75381652, Q75381654, Q75381650, Q75381646 and others. --Wolverène (talk) 18:15, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Not done renamed the items according to the suggestion of Wolverène. --Pasleim (talk) 15:08, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Sigrid of Halland (Q75437282): Invented unsourced character found in some pedigrees: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
This is an unsourced "person", and by all probability non-existing as well as unencyclopedic viking-age person. The only 'source' given for this entry seem to be a random e-mail between Shaun Hobson and Darryl Lundy from the 5th of February (which year ?). I don't think we can rely on such a random conversation by e-mail as source for something as important as family relations in the viking age, when no (as in NO) actual real sources mentions a 'Sigrid of Halland' in this way. --Oleryhlolsson (talk) 16:42, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Oleryhlolsson: how about adding a statements/references that it's likely legendary ? I think it's an advantage of having it to avoid that other users who come across it need to research it again. --- Jura 05:36, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Perhaps your right, but then I would probably prefer to call it fictious or invented since I can't see, that she fits any legends that we know of. Oleryhlolsson (talk) 20:16, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Not done --Pasleim (talk) 15:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Saiee Manjrekar (Q79035164): Indian actress: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No evidence of notability DannyS712 (talk) 06:55, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Wait I'd like to see if I can populate it. She may be a keeper if filled out properly. Quakewoody (talk) 10:36, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I filled in some information. I am voting keep primarily because of her family links. Her career is not yet notable. But, because of her family, she will in the future have a career that passes. So, between having 3 immediate family links, and one movie link - it is going to be re-created, so why bother deleting. Quakewoody (talk) 11:57, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:00, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Not done --Pasleim (talk) 15:22, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Viktoria Rybárová (Q53984996): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability? Infovarius (talk) 08:53, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- A civilian victim of Hungarian troops during the 1968 Warsaw Pact invasion? [3] If she couldn't be in theory called an anti-military activist, she is/was probably not notable. --Wolverène (talk) 09:07, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- I put victims of the 1968 invasion on Wikidata, they are significant, there are articles, plaques and memorials about them.--Ben Skála (talk) 09:12, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- I was going to post this one for the foreign language readers to see. But, as to an opinion - foreign language. foreign events. foreign culture. politics. activism. not my area of knowledge. Quakewoody (talk)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:10, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Not done --Pasleim (talk) 15:24, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
D. Michael Center (Q64861636): researcher: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Unidentifiable item with one bad link. --Ghouston (talk) 11:28, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- Actually there is [4] for this one. Ghouston (talk) 11:33, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- Not sure of notability, but seems to be valid data.(http://hilgardia.ucanr.edu/Abstract/?a=hilg.v57n01p040) Peter James (talk) 15:08, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Not done meets #2 of WD:N --Pasleim (talk) 16:18, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q82264965: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Seems to be a test creation. Yair rand (talk) 17:25, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q76857788: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable item about the creating editor. Yair rand (talk) 17:26, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q56599246: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability Jgillich (talk) 17:50, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q80225483: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability Jgillich (talk) 17:50, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q26177880: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
This item is for the "Bản mẫu:Loạt bài Dịch thuật" page on the Vietnamese Wikipedia but it has already been linked to Q6004886 so there is no reason to leave this item while it doesn't have any interwiki links. --Q.Khải (talk) 12:55, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Q83169958: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty --هيفيدار (talk) 15:53, 19 January 2020 (UTC)