Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2023/01/25

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Lexeme:L997147

invalid ID (L997147): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a lexeme Jon Harald Søby (talk) 21:19, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:20, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Q21931492

Landa Park (Q21931492): park in Aschcroft, New South Wales, Australia: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Actual location is in Gard Park. GNB in archive.org gives nothing. I’ve been to the location, it is a playground with excercise equipment, but it’s absolutely all Gard Park. Definitely doesn’t exist. - Chris.sherlock3 (talk) 01:05, 21 January 2023 (UTC) --Chris.sherlock3 (talk) 01:05, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Comment @Chris.sherlock3 It have to be deleted on cebwiki first. Fralambert (talk) 02:19, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

From what I can see, cebwiki has a bot that creates the article based on Wikidata entries with geocoords. Are you sure it should be deleted on cebwiki first? This would mean that virtually all entries with location data would need to first be deleted on cebwiki before we could delete them on Wikidata. That presents me with the problem that I don’t speak cebwiki’s language (and I don’t even know what that language is!) and that if they refuse to delete the non-existent place then we are also stuck with a non-existent place. - Chris.sherlock3 (talk) 03:32, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

«I don’t even know what that language is!» => See w:en:ISO 639:ceb. 2A01:CB14:D52:1200:141:C262:8BA7:4741 09:03, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, but unfortunately it doesn’t help. That project is completely moribund. For whatever reason, there are apparently 100 or so participants and almost no active participants. It also doesn’t have an AFD process! - Chris.sherlock3 (talk) 09:06, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

https://proposals.gnb.nsw.gov.au/public/geonames/27d677bf-0160-44c5-a8be-6f0710f1a93a has a description. Coordinates point to a location south of Gard Park, which is probably inaccurate as according to https://www.liverpool.nsw.gov.au/trim/documents?RecordNumber=205624.2019 it's on Stanwell Crescent (it also says Stanwell Oval is separate). https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Edwin_Wheeler_Oval_in_Landa_Park,_Sadleir.jpg is also said to be in Landa Park, but at a different location (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/810716893), and https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/29226963/state-of-the-environment-report-2010-2011-liverpool-city-council says it's one of several parks adjoining the Elouera Nature Reserve. So it exists but I couldn't find it on any maps. Peter James (talk) 15:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Actually… that may make sense. Stanwell Park is massive and consists of several parks and playing fields, and adjoins what looks like scrubland. I’ll go back and have another look at some point. - Chris.sherlock3 (talk) 07:19, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

I guess that means

Withdrawn for bot --Emu (talk) 21:54, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Not deleted See above. Lymantria (talk) 09:54, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Q116368200

Q116368200: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promotion by a locked LTA, remake of Q108757856, Q108776112, Q113625405. Achim55 (talk) 11:32, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Deleted by Lymantria (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:58, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Q116164812

Q116164812: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable.Connected article deleted. –– Yahya (talk) 23:27, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Deleted by Lymantria (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:58, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Q3586069

Q3586069: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The only Wikiproject which used this item was deleted after an AfD. Therefore, it does not meet Wikidata:Notability. Veverve (talk) 10:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:10, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Q115722043

Q115722043: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unclear why this should redirect to Linhai Station (Q11612552). RZuo (talk) 18:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

@RZuo Could you explain why this is a deletion issue? Seems like you are unhappy with the merge, just sort it out with @Liuxinyu970226 in another forum. --Emu (talk) 21:27, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

as long as i remember, items are not recycled. they cannot be redirected to other irrelevant items. RZuo (talk) 23:27, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

I no longer need that item when w:zh:閹人 has converted to be a regular article by nominator, if you think merge to another disambiguation item isn't proper, just delete it, I have no other opinions. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:56, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --Lymantria (talk) 12:19, 25 January 2023 (UTC)