Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/LoganTheWatermelon
From Wikidata
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Closed as unsuccessful, because requester has been blocked indefinetely. Lymantria (talk) 07:57, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
RfP scheduled to end after 6 December 2019 20:57 (UTC)
- LoganTheWatermelon (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Blurb... (I want to begin doing translation on pages...). --LoganTheWatermelon (talk) 20:57, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Votes
[edit]- Strong oppose SUL, number of contributions and the request is not made properly. I even hesitate to put the delete template —Eihel (talk) 21:40, 29 November 2019 (UTC) …and the request is still not transcluded —Eihel (talk) 02:08, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong oppose The user registered only eight days ago and has already managed to get themselves indefinitely blocked in enwiki (see Special:CentralAuth/LoganTheWatermelon). --Shinnin (talk) 00:03, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Do not disturb the community and stop using google translations. If we had a need in google translations we would ask bot owners to add it automatically. Which language(s) is/are native to you? Maybe you'd better translate into that/those language(s) only, I believe you might do it OK. --Wolverène (talk) 05:21, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Even when it comes to translating into languages that you speak, titles of scientific papers still don't need to be translated by hand. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 09:05, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- True. This moment can be explained to the user (if we're still supposing a good contribution from him..). --Wolverène (talk) 09:16, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Even when it comes to translating into languages that you speak, titles of scientific papers still don't need to be translated by hand. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 09:05, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong oppose Your activity already feels quite distruptive and if you continue to contribute the way you did up to now, there's a good chance you get banned. 09:05, 2 December 2019 (UTC)ChristianKl ❪✉❫
- Strong oppose - no use case (not needed to translate), no track record, only track record is a checkuser block on enwiki, no experience, etc. --DannyS712 (talk) 09:27, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong oppose. Per everyone - Premeditated (talk) 22:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]- Factoring in the repeated rights requests, the enwiki block, and comments like [1] I've blocked indefinitely. --Rschen7754 19:58, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]