Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/M4r51n

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Withdrawn by candidate. Legoktm (talk) 21:03, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

M4r51n

[edit]

Vote
RfP scheduled to end after 3 June 2013 22:20 (UTC)

Mostly I'm reverting vandalism with my rollback rights, requesting items for deletion and adding info in the items. I think that I need the administrator rights.. I don't know if the fact that I'm new user here will affect on this request but let we see. Regards :)--M4r51n (talk) 22:20, 27 May 2013 (UTC) I have editor and reviewer rights on macedonian wikipedia, sysop on macedonian wikibooks and rollbacker, autopatrolled rights here..:) --M4r51n (talk) 08:23, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

[edit]
  1.  Weak support RFD work and vandalfighting looks good, no huge problems as far as I can see, but you have only been regularly contributing since the end of March. --Jakob Scream about the things I've broken 16:17, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
     Comment Thanks for the vote as I said in the comment request I'm new user here :)) Regards --M4r51n (talk) 17:39, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Weak support I don't agree that you need the tools, but adminship on Wikidata is really no big deal and I don't think you need too much time to understand how things work. AutomaticStrikeout 18:58, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
     Comment Thanks for the vote :) I added this request mainly for the RFD and to help the community --M4r51n (talk) 19:15, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Weak support per the above two. Sidenote: You do not need to reply to every !vote to reiterate things you've already said. TCN7JM 02:37, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Switching to  Oppose. The answers to the questions are a bit concerning to me as well. I'd like to see you continue to contribute to Wikidata though, and I'll definitely reconsider in a few months. TCN7JM 22:47, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Weak oppose per all of the above. I don't really see anything wrong with the candidate, but everyone admits candidate is new here. Take a couple of additional months to get settled, then be my guest. StevenJ81 (talk) 15:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Oppose, nothing personal, but IMO haven't been active too long on Wikidata. Some more months, and I don't have any problems with supporting you. --Stryn (talk) 16:48, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Weak oppose per above--DangSunM (talk) 19:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Oppose Would've happily supported with some good answers to the questions below, but I think a bit more time on Wikidata would be beneficial. Ajraddatz (Talk) 22:07, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Oppose Sorry, but the answer to the questions below is concerning. --Rschen7754 22:14, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Weak oppose — can retry in few weeks IMHO. --Ricordisamoa 04:31, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Oppose I'm sorry, but your answers to my questions were really... lacking. I understand that English is not your primary language, so I'm willing to forgive some of the vagueness, but I need to know what to expect from a fellow administrator, and you really haven't provided any clarity as to how you'd operate. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 19:52, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • Could you please post some more detailed Babel information on your userpage? Thanks. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 06:48, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • You may also want to mention the userrights that you have on other wikis, as this may help your candidacy. --Rschen7754 06:49, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hmm. This is a tough one. There are no obvious red flags, and your work appears to be quite good, but none of us really knows you that well. So, while we normally don't do stuff like this in RFAs here, I was wondering if you'd be willing to answer a few questions about how you'd work as an administrator. To wit:
    1. In your opinion, when, if ever, is it appropriate to block someone without warning?
    2. To what extent, if any, should cross-wiki behavior be taken into consideration when dealing with a problematic user?
    3. In which cases, if any, should you preëmptively disable e-mail and talkpage access when blocking an account?
    4. In which cases, if any, should you request that the stewards lock an account you've blocked?
    5. How extensively, if at all, should an administrator review a deletion request before pressing the button? Do the circumstances change if it's bot-reported as opposed to user-reported? If so, how?
    6. What level of vandalism is necessary to warrant protecting an item? Are there any factors other than vandalism frequency that you might take into consideration when making a decision?
There are no "right" or "wrong" answers here, and definitely no "trick questions". Feel free to ignore these questions if you prefer. I just want to get an idea of what it would be like to have you as a sysop. Thanks. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 08:05, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  1. First I would warn the user and tell him how to contribute to wikidata regularly and if he do that a few times again I would probably block him.
  2. -
  3. If the user don't stop with the vandalisms and don't have good contributions
  4. -
  5. Check the item, check If there is another item like that, check the linking
  6. Depends.. --M4r51n (talk) 08:30, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that my chances for adminship are 0%. I would contribute and contribute and after some time I'll request again because I really want to help Wikidata.. Thanks for the advices and for the votes :) --M4r51n (talk) 23:45, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Administrator/M4r51n&oldid=49041469"