Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/Sailbot
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Not done @Simon.letort: This request seems to be abandoned, please reopen it if that is not the case. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:59, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sailbot[edit]
Sailbot (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Operator: Simon.letort (talk • contribs • logs)
Task/s: Import sailboat data from English Wikipedia Infobox sailboat specifications.
Code: In progress here. Starting approval process prior to test run.
Function details: The English Wikipedia Infobox sailboat specifications contains data for around 1.5k sailboats. The WikiProject Sailing community regularly create new Wikipedia articles using that Infobox. A Wikidata Sailboat data model has also been defined. This bot implements consistent import of information about sailboats to Wikidata from Infobox sailboat specifications in line with the Sailboat data model.
The following information is imported:
- en:Template:Infobox_sailboat_specifications parameter 'name' -> entity label
- instance of (P31) set to sailboat class (Q106179098)
- en:Template:Infobox_sailboat_specifications parameter 'image' -> image (P18)
- en:Template:Infobox_sailboat_specifications parameter 'lwl' -> length (P2043) of (P642) waterline length (Q1817392)
- en:Template:Infobox_sailboat_specifications parameter 'draft' -> draft (P2262) and height (P2048) of (P642) draft (Q244777)
- en:Template:Infobox_sailboat_specifications parameter 'construction' -> made from material (P186)
- en:Template:Infobox_sailboat_specifications parameter 'beam' -> beam (P2261) and width (P2049)
- en:Template:Infobox_sailboat_specifications parameter 'designer' -> designed by (P287)
- en:Template:Infobox_sailboat_specifications parameter 'no built' -> total produced (P1092)
- en:Template:Infobox_sailboat_specifications parameter 'phrf' -> rating (P4271) of (P642) Performance Handicap Racing Fleet (Q7168207)
- en:Template:Infobox_sailboat_specifications parameter 'loa' -> length (P2043) of (P642) length overall (Q2358152)
- en:Template:Infobox_sailboat_specifications parameter 'year' -> inception (P571)
--Simon.letort (talk) 10:46, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- When you are ready, please do a test run.
- BTW, Maybe you have seen Wikidata:Project_chat#New_essay:_of_(P642)_considered_harmful. Accordingly, another qualifier than P642 would be preferable, possibly criterion used (P1013).
- Not sure what to make of "parameter 'draft' -> draft (P2262) and height (P2048) of (P642) draft (Q244777)" above. If P2262 is used, I wouldn't re-add the same with P2048. --- Jura 12:55, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm a little skeptical of the usage of rating (P4271) here. The proposed usage doesn't match the majority of usages of the property nor its description. I don't think we have a good property for this though. Maybe test score (P5022). BrokenSegue (talk) 15:46, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree that rating (P4271) is not ideal, it should be used as qualifier (Q54828449) not as main value (Q54828448). However test score (P5022) has a similar constraint, I tried here J/92s (Q97179551). So far, I was not able to find a better property that could be used as as main value (Q54828448). -- Simon.letort (talk) 12:24, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Simon.letort: I think you just need to swap the test taken and test scored properties (which is a qualifier of which) and it'll work BrokenSegue (talk) 03:25, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree that rating (P4271) is not ideal, it should be used as qualifier (Q54828449) not as main value (Q54828448). However test score (P5022) has a similar constraint, I tried here J/92s (Q97179551). So far, I was not able to find a better property that could be used as as main value (Q54828448). -- Simon.letort (talk) 12:24, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Depending on Wikidata_talk:WikiProject_Sailing#Has_part_and_has_quality, some adjusts to qualifiers might be needed, but given the planned volume of your import, I'd adjust this later and not worry about it before. --- Jura 21:33, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- J/92s (Q97179551) looks good. Swap should be done and maybe eventually some qualifiers tweaked, but I think it's good to go. --- Jura 21:33, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Please, do 50-250 test edits. Lymantria (talk) 07:26, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Simon.letort: You might have missed the request for test edits? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:12, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry. I've been away from Wiki for few months. Simon.letort (talk) 14:05, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Simon.letort: You might have missed the request for test edits? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:12, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]