Property talk:P8573
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Documentation
LSG localbody code
Localbody code (political territorial entity) in Local Self Government Department (Kerala) site
Localbody code (political territorial entity) in Local Self Government Department (Kerala) site
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Conflicts with “instance of (P31): Wikimedia disambiguation page (Q4167410), Wikimedia category (Q4167836), Wikimedia template (Q11266439), Wikimedia list article (Q13406463)”: this property must not be used with the listed properties and values. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8573#Conflicts with P31, hourly updated report, SPARQLScope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8573#Scope, hourly updated report, SPARQLAllowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8573#Entity types
Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8573#Unique value, hourly updated report, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8573#Single value, hourly updated report, SPARQL List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8573#Format, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Type “administrative territorial entity (Q56061), political entity (Q16562419), political territorial entity (Q1048835)”: item must contain property “instance of (P31), subclass of (P279)” with classes “administrative territorial entity (Q56061), political entity (Q16562419), political territorial entity (Q1048835)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8573#Type Q56061, Q16562419, Q1048835, hourly updated report, SPARQLItem “country (P17): India (Q668)”: Items with this property should also have “country (P17): India (Q668)”. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8573#Item P17, hourly updated report, search, SPARQLItem “located in the administrative territorial entity (P131)”: Items with this property should also have “located in the administrative territorial entity (P131)”. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8573#Item P131, hourly updated report, search, SPARQLItem “instance of (P31): Gram panchayat (Q2732840), municipal corporation in India (Q6936225), municipality (Q15284), Block Panchayat (Q4927168), District Councils of India (Q2758248), census town of India (Q16830604), administrative territorial entity (Q56061), municipal council of India (Q6958514)”: Items with this property should also have “instance of (P31): Gram panchayat (Q2732840), municipal corporation in India (Q6936225), municipality (Q15284), Block Panchayat (Q4927168), District Councils of India (Q2758248), census town of India (Q16830604), administrative territorial entity (Q56061), municipal council of India (Q6958514)”. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8573#Item P31, hourly updated report, search
This property is being used by: Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
|
Your changes since 29 October 2020
[edit]Hello Gnoeee
I don't understand what is the problem with my addition. I put it back. In addition, your modification is already controlled by subject type constraint (Q21503250). Your addition being incomplete, I added the missing Items. Could you tell me what is the need for your constraint (item-requires-statement constraint (Q21503247))?
Cordially. —Eihel (talk) 17:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Eihel: The item this property is added must only have instance of (P31):Gram panchayat (Q2732840)/municipal corporation in India (Q6936225)/municipality (Q15284)/Block Panchayat (Q4927168)/ District Councils of India (Q2758248)/municipal council of India (Q6958514). Then for items with instance of (P31):Gram panchayat (Q2732840) the part of (P361) will be any of the Block Panchayat (Q4927168) of Kerala (Q1186) (152nos) and for items with instance of (P31):Block Panchayat (Q4927168) the part of (P361) will be any of the District Councils of India (Q2758248) of Kerala (14nos).❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 17:36, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Gnoeee: You write The item this property is added must only have (…) Nagar Palika (Q6958514). So I did well to add it, as well as 2 others . For part of (P361), the site is under the name "Government of Kerala". If Kerala cannot be added, I remove it. A complex constraint should exist as a replacement (with subclasses and/or OR operators for example) . —Eihel (talk) 18:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- India-related properties
- All Properties
- Properties with external-id-datatype
- Properties used on 1000+ items
- Properties with conflicts with constraints
- Properties with scope constraints
- Properties with entity type constraints
- Properties with unique value constraints
- Properties with single value constraints
- Properties with format constraints
- Properties with constraints on type
- Properties with constraints on items using them