Property talk:P141

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

IUCN conservation status
conservation status assigned by the International Union for Conservation of Nature
DescriptionThe IUCN Red List Classification for organisms listed in the list. The value of the property should be the most updated one published by IUCN, using the most updated status system possible.
Representsconservation status (Q82673), International Union for Conservation of Nature (Q48268)
Data typeItem
Template parameterw:Template:Taxobox, ar:قالب:تصنيف كائن
Domain
According to this template: taxons with taxon rank (P105) => species (Q7432), variety (Q767728) or subspecies (Q68947)
According to statements in the property:
taxon (Q16521)
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed values
According to this template: conservation status (Q82673) (latest list)
According to statements in the property:
not applicable, Least Concern (Q211005), Near Threatened (Q719675), Vulnerable (Q278113), Endangered species (Q11394), Critically Endangered (Q219127), extinct in the wild (Q239509), extinct species (Q237350) or Data Deficient (Q3245245)
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
ExampleBalaenoptera musculus (Q42196)Endangered species (Q11394)
Mediterranean monk seal (Q208549)Critically Endangered (Q219127)
Salmo trutta (Q2857311)Least Concern (Q211005)
Barasingha (Q506308)Vulnerable (Q278113)
Elaphurus davidianus (Q207906)extinct in the wild (Q239509)
Raphus cucullatus (Q43502)extinct species (Q237350)
African skimmer (Q18766)Near Threatened (Q719675)
Salvia rosmarinus (Q102240169)Least Concern (Q211005)
Format and edit filter validationAbuse filter #15
Tracking: sameno label (Q22914798)
Tracking: differencesno label (Q21685876)
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P141 (Q22914799)
Tracking: local yes, WD nono label (Q22914800)
See alsoIUCN protected areas category (P814), Status in the Red List of Threatened Species in the Czech Republic (P5841), IUCN taxon ID (P627)
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total152,465
Main statement152,28399.9% of uses
Qualifier1790.1% of uses
Reference3<0.1% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P141#Single value, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Item “taxon name (P225): Items with this property should also have “taxon name (P225)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). Known exceptions: Varia jamoerensis (Q27988539)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P141#Item P225, search, SPARQL
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). Known exceptions: Varia jamoerensis (Q27988539)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P141#Item P105, search
Item “IUCN taxon ID (P627): Items with this property should also have “IUCN taxon ID (P627)”. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P141#Item P627, hourly updated report, search, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P141#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P141#Scope, SPARQL
Type “taxon (Q16521): item must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “taxon (Q16521)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P141#Type Q16521, SPARQL
Value IUCN category Ia: Strict Nature Reserve (Q14545608) will be automatically replaced to value IUCN category Ia: Strict Nature Reserve (Q14545608) and moved to IUCN protected areas category (P814) property.
Testing: TODO list
This property is being used by:

Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

Table of values[edit]

IUCN conservation status classifications
Item Status (en) الحالة (ar)
Q211005 Least Concern غير مهدد
Q719675 Near Threatened نوع قريب من الخطر
Q158862 Conservation Dependent
Q278113 Vulnerable خطر انقراض أدنى
Q11394 Endangered أنواع مهددة بالانقراض
Q219127 Critically Endangered خطر انقراض أقصى
Q239509 Extinct in the Wild نوع منقرض في البرية 
Q237350 Extinct أنواع منقرضة
Q3245245 Data Deficient نوع ناقص البيانات

Extinct[edit]

I propose to move from Extinction (which is general article) to Extinct (which is exactly IUCN conservation status). . I also suggest that it will require some changes in User:Ricordisamoa/Wikispecies.js and Special:AbuseFilter/15. Infovarius (talk) 09:44, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done the changes. --Ricordisamoa 19:25, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Update: now SamoaBot can handle these situations: it can change the claim value, and also add a reference. Here is the current approval discussion. --Ricordisamoa 22:45, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A few remaining old ones are listed at Constraint_violations. --  Docu  at 20:55, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, it occurs to me that Legobot and SamoaBot already changed all values. You can check here. --Ricordisamoa 23:10, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

History of assignments[edit]

There's a little edit war at Q15083. Can anyone else (except Succu) discuss if we should/can/prohibit to store historical information about conservation status in Wikidata? I suppose that (usually, as for other properties) we can. Infovarius (talk) 12:15, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I support storing the historic values. ChristianKl (talk) 11:29, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What do you understand by „historic value”? In the case in question the cirumscription of the species radically changed. How would you annotate this? --Succu (talk) 13:11, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Circumscription may be, but for a new species we create a new item. So one item contain information (historical too) for one taxon. --Infovarius (talk) 18:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Another random statement, Infovarius? --Succu (talk) 21:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full information[edit]

For state (Q7275). For example, Germany (Q183): member of (P463) - Economic, Monetary and Social Union (Q2595976) 1.07.1990 - 2.10.1990; European Atomic Energy Community (Q8919) - 1957-2009; Western European Union (Q189946) - 1954-2011; European Coal and Steel Community (Q161549) - 1951-2002. currency (P38) - Deutsche Mark (Q16068) 1948-2001; flag image (P41) - 1919, 1933, 1935; shares border with (P47) Czechoslovakia (Q33946) 1918-1992, German Democratic Republic (Q16957). head of state (P35) - Theodor Heuss (Q2594) - 1949-1959 and so on.

For university (Q3918). For example, Leipzig University (Q154804): official name (P1448) - 1991-1953, rector (P1075) Johannes Otto von Münsterberg (Q1698117) - 1409-1410 and so on

For automobile manufacturer (Q786820). For example, Mercedes-Benz Group (Q27530): follows (P155) Daimler-Benz AG (Q541477), Maybach (Q35989); employees (P1128) 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015; has subsidiary (P355) Chrysler (Q181114) 1998-2007 ... and so on.

For species (Q7432). For example, giraffe (Q15083): IUCN conservation status (P141) - 12.2016. And only? Why? Where 09.2016? species (Q7432) has less right to display the full information? --Fractaler (talk) 10:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Status: Not evaluated[edit]

When a species has no record in the IUCN database (e.g. Lirimiris auriflua (Q13480988) and is classed as "Not evaluated" according to GBIF, the statement should not generate a warning that the IUCN is missing. @Daniel_Mietchen: FYI --DarTar (talk) 19:55, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Around two million species are not evaluated by the IUCN. We do not mark them with not evaluated (Q3350324). --Succu (talk) 20:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
But how would you present historical values then? I wanted to add that European hamster (Q208077) was not evaluated before July 2020, when it was immediately added to the list as "critically endangered". Now there're two validation errors, which are both wrong in my opinion. --Tkarcher (talk) 09:27, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]